There has been a fair amount of discussion recently about the CIPR's consultation paper on social media, which I announced at our annual conference and which has been widely publicised since.
The blogging community obviously had the most to say - some of it dealt with the general principles involved, some with the specific questions posed. But there was also an encouraging response from the membership generally, many of whom are still struggling to understand the significance of what they are seeing and reading about. It's important that we hear from as wide a cross-section of our membership as possible: these issues affect us all, and so we all need to give them some thought.
The other important thing to say is that this is an evolving area, and our work here is certainly at an evolutionary stage! The consultation paper we've put together is exactly that - it's for consultation with our members and the wider public. It poses a number of specific questions, and we are genuinely eager to hear people's views so that we can use them and reflect them.
Ultimately of course, consultations work best when people actually respond, so I would urge as many of you as possible to read the paper, and respond, ahead of the extended deadline of 31st January 2007.
Another organisation looking for contributions from practitioners is Euprera, a group of leading researchers from universities and institutions across more than 30 countries. Its EuroBlog 2007 initiative is trying to establish what impact weblogs and social software are having on public relations and communications practice. Last year's study found that although many PR professionals were embracing the new media, a significant number failed to see any business or organisational advantage.
Recent Comments